Konya\u2019da 2020\u2019de 6 ayl\u0131k hamile e\u015fi Sadife Y\u00fczer\u2019i \u00f6ld\u00fcren Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer\u2019in davas\u0131nda \u201chaks\u0131z tahrik\u201d indirimiyle verilen 23 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 Yarg\u0131tay taraf\u0131ndan uygun bulunmad\u0131. Uzun s\u00fcren bozma ve itiraz s\u00fcre\u00e7lerinin ard\u0131ndan mahkeme Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a uydu ve san\u0131\u011fa yeniden m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 verdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Konya<\/a>‘da 6 ayl\u0131k hamile e\u015fi Sadife Y\u00fczer\u2019i (35), karn\u0131ndaki bebe\u011fin kendisinden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla t\u00fcfekle vurarak \u00f6ld\u00fcren Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer (40), ‘haks\u0131z tahrik’ ve ‘iyi hal indirimi’ ile 23 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 verilen karar\u0131n Yarg\u0131tay<\/a> taraf\u0131ndan ikinci kez bozulmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan yeniden Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019nde hakim kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Daha \u00f6nce iki kez karar\u0131nda direnen mahkeme, bu kez Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n karar\u0131na uyup san\u0131\u011fa m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 verdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u00c7umra il\u00e7esi Dineksaray Mahallesi’nde \u00e7ift\u00e7ilik yapan 12 y\u0131ll\u0131k evli Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer, 16 Aral\u0131k 2020\u2019de, 3 \u00e7ocu\u011funun annesi 6 ayl\u0131k hamile e\u015fi Sadife Y\u00fczer’i karn\u0131ndaki bebe\u011fin kendisinden olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131yla \u00e7\u0131kan tart\u0131\u015fmada t\u00fcfekle 5 el ate\u015f ederek vurdu. Sadife Y\u00fczer yere y\u0131\u011f\u0131ld\u0131, Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer ise sa\u011fl\u0131k ekiplerine haber verdi. Sadife Y\u00fczer, adrese sevk edilen sa\u011fl\u0131k g\u00f6revlilerinin m\u00fcdahalesine ra\u011fmen kurtar\u0131lamad\u0131. Jandarma taraf\u0131ndan g\u00f6zalt\u0131na al\u0131nan Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer, tutukland\u0131. Yap\u0131lan DNA testinde, Y\u00fczer’in, \u00f6len bebe\u011fin babas\u0131 oldu\u011fu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Konya 3’\u00fcnc\u00fc A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019nde, ‘Gebe oldu\u011funu bildi\u011fi e\u015fine kar\u015f\u0131 kasten \u00f6ld\u00fcrmek’ su\u00e7undan yarg\u0131lanan Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer, a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131. Mahkeme heyeti, Y\u00fczer’in su\u00e7u ‘haks\u0131z tahrik’ alt\u0131nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi\u011fine kanaat getirip cezay\u0131 m\u00fcebbet hapse indirdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Y\u00fczer’in avukat\u0131, bir \u00fcst mahkeme olan Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvurup, karara itirazda bulundu. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1’inci Ceza Dairesi, cezay\u0131 fazla bulup, karar\u0131 bozarak dosyay\u0131 yeniden 3’\u00fcnc\u00fc A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderdi. Yerel mahkeme yine ayn\u0131 karar\u0131 verdi. Dosya, tekrar Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi\u2019ne g\u00f6nderildi. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1’inci Ceza Dairesi’nde 8 Haziran 2023\u2019te g\u00f6r\u00fclen duru\u015fmada Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer’e \u00f6nce m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131 verildi. Y\u00fczer’in ‘yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecindeki davran\u0131\u015flar\u0131n\u0131’ g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurarak cezay\u0131 23 y\u0131la d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bu karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan dosya temyiz i\u00e7in Yarg\u0131tay\u2019a g\u00f6nderildi. Yarg\u0131tay 1’inci Ceza Dairesi, Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer’in cinayeti ‘haks\u0131z tahrik’ h\u00fck\u00fcmleri olmadan i\u015fledi\u011fine kanaat getirerek Y\u00fczer’in oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla yeniden yarg\u0131lanmas\u0131 talebiyle dosyay\u0131 b\u00f6lge mahkemesine g\u00f6nderdi. Ancak B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1\u2019inci Ceza Dairesi karar\u0131nda direnip, ‘\u015f\u00fcpheden san\u0131k yararlan\u0131r’ diyerek yine 23 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131 verdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130tiraz \u00fczerine dosya yeniden Yarg\u0131tay’a g\u00f6nderildi. Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 1\u2019inci Ceza Dairesi, Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1\u2019inci Ceza Dairesi’nin kararda direnmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu belirtti. Oy \u00e7oklu\u011fu ile al\u0131nan kararda, “Sadife’den kaynakl\u0131 herhangi bir hiddet veya \u015fiddetli eleme yol a\u00e7acak hareket bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 halde haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda mahkemenin direnme karar\u0131 yerinde g\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir” denildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosya, bu kez Yarg\u0131tay Ceza Genel Kurulu’na g\u00f6nderildi. Dosyay\u0131 inceleyen Ceza Genel Kurulu da haks\u0131z tahrik h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini belirterek oy \u00e7oklu\u011fuyla karar\u0131 bozdu. Kararda, \u201cMaktul\u00fcn su\u00e7 tarihinden \u00f6nceki s\u00fcre\u00e7te san\u0131\u011f\u0131 aldatt\u0131\u011f\u0131 iddias\u0131 ispat edilememi\u015f, aksine san\u0131\u011f\u0131n maktule y\u00f6nelik bask\u0131 ve \u015fiddet i\u00e7eren davran\u0131\u015flarda bulundu\u011fu maddi delillerle ortaya konulmu\u015ftur\u201d ifadeleri yer ald\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Dosya, yeniden istinaf mahkemesine g\u00f6nderildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yarg\u0131tay 1\u2019inci Ceza Dairesi, Konya B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1\u2019inci Ceza Dairesi’nin kararda direnmesinin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek yeniden g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi dosyada, mahkeme Yarg\u0131tay\u2019\u0131n karar\u0131na uydu. B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1’inci Ceza Dairesi, Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer\u2019e m\u00fcebbet hapis cezas\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Konya\u2019da 2020\u2019de 6 ayl\u0131k hamile e\u015fi Sadife Y\u00fczer\u2019i \u00f6ld\u00fcren Ali R\u0131za Y\u00fczer\u2019in davas\u0131nda \u201chaks\u0131z tahrik\u201d…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":472,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ulusal-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=471"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":473,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/471\/revisions\/473"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}YEREL MAHKEMEDEN M\u00dcEBBET HAP\u0130S<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
KARARA \u0130T\u0130RAZ ED\u0130LD\u0130<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
YARGITAY: C\u0130NAYET HAKSIZ TAHR\u0130K H\u00dcK\u00dcMLER\u0130 OLMADAN \u0130\u015eLEND\u0130<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
“B\u00d6LGE ADL\u0130YE MAHKEMES\u0130\u2019N\u0130N KARARA D\u0130RENMES\u0130 HUKUKA AYKIRI”<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
MAHKEME KARARA UYDU<\/h3>\n\n\n\n