{"id":447,"date":"2026-06-10T14:33:20","date_gmt":"2026-06-10T14:33:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/?p=447"},"modified":"2026-06-10T14:33:20","modified_gmt":"2026-06-10T14:33:20","slug":"istinaf-mahkemesi-secil-erzanin-itirazini-kabul-etti","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/?p=447","title":{"rendered":"\u0130stinaf mahkemesi, Se\u00e7il Erzan’\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\u0130stinaf mahkemesi, gizli fon davas\u0131nda 102 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lan Se\u00e7il Erzan’\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti. \u0130stanbul 41. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi’ndeki yeniden yarg\u0131lama 11 Eyl\u00fcl’de yap\u0131lacak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kamuoyunda “y\u00fcksek karl\u0131 gizli fon” ad\u0131yla bilinen doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k davas\u0131nda yarg\u0131lanan tutuklu san\u0131k Se\u00e7il Erzan, 11 Eyl\u00fcl’de yeniden yarg\u0131lanacak.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi (\u0130stinaf), Se\u00e7il Erzan’a verilen 102 y\u0131l 4 ay hapis cezas\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n bozulmas\u0131na h\u00fckmetti. \u0130stinaf, Erzan ve beraberindeki baz\u0131 san\u0131klar hakk\u0131ndaki hapis cezalar\u0131n\u0131 usul eksiklikleri nedeniyle bozup dosyay\u0131 yerel mahkemeye iade ederken, dosyadaki di\u011fer baz\u0131 san\u0131klar hakk\u0131nda verilen kararlar\u0131 ise hukuka uygun bularak onad\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

TUTUKLULUK HAL\u0130 DEVAM EDECEK<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Dosya yerel mahkeme olan \u0130stanbul 41. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesine ula\u015ft\u0131. Mahkeme tensip zapt\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenleyerek yarg\u0131laman\u0131n 11 Eyl\u00fcl g\u00fcn\u00fc ba\u015flamas\u0131na karar verdi. Yeniden yarg\u0131lanacak olan Erzan\u2019\u0131n tutukluluk halinin devam\u0131na karar verildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Se\u00e7il<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

NE OLMU\u015eTU?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nca haz\u0131rlanan iddianamede, san\u0131k Se\u00e7il Erzan’\u0131n bir bankan\u0131n Levent’teki \u015fubesinde m\u00fcd\u00fcr olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve m\u00fc\u015fteki B\u00fclent \u00c7eviker’den ki\u015fisel g\u00fcven ili\u015fkisine dayal\u0131 2 milyon dolar alarak y\u00fcksek kar vaadiyle yeniden kendisine iade edece\u011fini bildirdi\u011fi kaydedilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130ddianamede, para kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda yaz\u0131l\u0131 evrak verildi\u011fi ancak m\u00fc\u015fteki \u00c7eviker’in daha sonra Erzan’a ula\u015fmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015fsa da bunun ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fi, durumu bankaya bildirdi\u011fi, banka taraf\u0131ndan ara\u015ft\u0131rma yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131, Erzan hakk\u0131nda su\u00e7 duyurusunda bulunuldu\u011fu ifade edilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

San\u0131k Erzan’\u0131n bu y\u00f6ntemle futbolcular, i\u015f insanlar\u0131 ve \u00e7e\u015fitli meslek gruplar\u0131ndan m\u00fc\u015ftekilere, y\u00fcksek kar getirisi olan g\u00fcvenilir bir fon bulundu\u011funu ve kamuoyunda tan\u0131nan Fatih Terim ve Hakan Ate\u015f gibi isimlerin bu fona dahil oldu\u011funu s\u00f6yleyerek, m\u00fc\u015ftekileri bu fona para yat\u0131rmaya ikna etti\u011fi anlat\u0131lan iddianamede, ger\u00e7ekte ise b\u00f6yle bir fonun hi\u00e7 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespit edildi\u011fi belirtilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Se\u00e7il Erzan’\u0131n m\u00fc\u015ftekilerin verdi\u011fi paralara ili\u015fkin sahte belgeler olu\u015fturdu\u011fu bilgisine yer verilen iddianamede, Erzan’\u0131n bu belgelere bankan\u0131n ka\u015fesini ve \u0131slak imzas\u0131n\u0131 at\u0131p m\u00fc\u015ftekilere teslim etti\u011fi ve doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k kast\u0131yla hareket etti\u011fi ifadeleri yer alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130ddianamede, san\u0131k Erzan’\u0131n “\u00f6zel belgede sahtecilik” ve “tacir veya \u015firket y\u00f6neticisi olan ya da \u015firket ad\u0131na hareket eden ki\u015filerin ticari faaliyetleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda, kooperatif y\u00f6neticilerinin kooperatifin faaliyeti kapsam\u0131nda nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k” su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan 109 y\u0131ldan 358 y\u0131la kadar hapsi istenmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

San\u0131klar Ali Y\u00f6r\u00fck, Kerem Can, H\u00fcseyin Elig\u00fcl, Nazl\u0131 Can, Atilla Y\u00f6r\u00fck ve Asiye \u00d6zt\u00fcrk’\u00fcn de ayn\u0131 su\u00e7lardan 3 ile 98 y\u0131l aras\u0131nda hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 istenen iddianamede, san\u0131k R\u00fcya Sa\u011f\u0131r’\u0131n ise “nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k” su\u00e7undan 3 y\u0131ldan 10 y\u0131la kadar hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130ddianamede, S\u00fcleyman Aslan ve Mojtaba Haghani’nin “tefecilik” su\u00e7undan ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 2’\u015fer y\u0131ldan 6’\u015far y\u0131la kadar hapis ve 500 g\u00fcnden 5 bin g\u00fcne kadar adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 talep edilirken, Nur Erkasap’\u0131n ise “tacir veya \u015firket y\u00f6neticisi olan ya da \u015firket ad\u0131na hareket eden ki\u015filerin ticari faaliyetleri s\u0131ras\u0131nda, kooperatif y\u00f6neticilerinin kooperatifin faaliyeti kapsam\u0131nda doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k” su\u00e7undan 9 y\u0131ldan 30 y\u0131la kadar hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u0130stanbul Cumhuriyet Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u00d6rg\u00fctl\u00fc Su\u00e7lar Soru\u015fturma B\u00fcrosunca haz\u0131rlanan ve bu dava dosyas\u0131yla birle\u015ftirilmesine karar verilen iddianamede ise Hakan Ate\u015f ve Mehmet Aydo\u011fdu’nun 24 m\u00fc\u015ftekiye kar\u015f\u0131 “nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k” su\u00e7unu i\u015fledikleri iddias\u0131yla 72’\u015fer y\u0131ldan 240’ar y\u0131la kadar hapisle cezaland\u0131r\u0131lmalar\u0131 talep edilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yarg\u0131lama s\u00fcrecinde Canda\u015f G\u00fcrol hakk\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131lan dava da birle\u015ftirilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

102 YIL 4 AY HAP\u0130S CEZASI VE 753 B\u0130N TL PARA CEZASI<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Davay\u0131 1 Aral\u0131k 2025’te karar ba\u011flayan \u0130stanbul 41. A\u011f\u0131r Ceza Mahkemesi, san\u0131k Se\u00e7il Erzan’\u0131 27 m\u00fc\u015ftekiye kar\u015f\u0131 “nitelikli doland\u0131r\u0131c\u0131l\u0131k”, “\u00f6zel belgede sahtecilik” ile “g\u00fcveni k\u00f6t\u00fcye kullanma” su\u00e7lar\u0131ndan toplam 102 y\u0131l 4 ay hapis ile toplam 753 bin 880 lira adli para cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Mahkeme heyeti karar\u0131nda, san\u0131k Erzan hakk\u0131nda, “\u00f6zel belgede sahtecilik” su\u00e7undan her bir kat\u0131lana y\u00f6nelik ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 ceza istemiyle kamu davas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 an\u0131msatarak, bu su\u00e7un ma\u011fdurunun kamu oldu\u011funu, san\u0131\u011f\u0131n eyleminin de tek oldu\u011funun kabul edildi\u011fini belirtmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Kararda ayr\u0131ca “\u00f6zel belgede sahtecilik” su\u00e7undan verilen 1 y\u0131l 10 ay 15 g\u00fcn hapis cezas\u0131 hakk\u0131nda h\u00fckm\u00fcn a\u00e7\u0131klanmas\u0131n\u0131n geri b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131na karar veren heyet, Erzan’\u0131n bu su\u00e7 y\u00f6n\u00fcnden 5 y\u0131l s\u00fcreyle denetimli serbestlik tedbirine tabi tutulmas\u0131na h\u00fckmetmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Erzan’\u0131n kat\u0131lanlar Nesrin \u00c7ak\u0131r, Kaan Sinih, Sevgil Sinih, Tursun Sinih, Erkan Karaca, Atilla Balta\u015f, Erc\u00fcment G\u00fclen, Bakiye G\u00fclen, Kemal Tan\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz, Merve \u00d6zer Y\u0131lmaz ile m\u00fc\u015fteki san\u0131klar Mojtaba Haghani, Nur Erkasap ve S\u00fcleyman Arslan’a y\u00f6nelik eyleminden dolay\u0131 da beraatine karar verilmi\u015fti.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u0130stinaf mahkemesi, gizli fon davas\u0131nda 102 y\u0131l hapis cezas\u0131na \u00e7arpt\u0131r\u0131lan Se\u00e7il Erzan’\u0131n itiraz\u0131n\u0131 kabul etti….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":448,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,17],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-son-dakika","category-ulusal-haberler"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=447"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":449,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/447\/revisions\/449"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/448"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gundem44.com.tr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}